This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
MASs Regulatory Calculus MASs decision to act decisively now is grounded in its growing concern over the money laundering and terrorism financing risks posed by such operations, especially so given their cross-border and internet-based natures. This means DTSPs are not allowed to rely on them to carry out customer duediligence.
The aim is to mitigate the risks associated with such businesses. These include maintaining a minimum capital of S$ 250,000 and adhering to stringent AML/CFT obligations, such as conducting customer duediligence, monitoring transactions, and reporting suspicious activities.
The bank stands accused of failing to assess money laundering and terrorism financing risks; regulators said record-keeping was faulty and the company failed to monitor customer duediligence on transactions that may have been tied to child exploitation and endangerment. “There was no evidence of intentional wrongdoing.”.
First, there’s the Capture product, which optimizes the duediligence portion of the onboarding process, Lam explained. Second, there are the risk management technologies, including the cyberspace crawler that automatically reads and analyzes social posts about the merchant.
The move aims to protect against financial crime and loss, particularly in digital fraud, and includes broadening DPT service definitions and enhancing Anti-Money Laundering (AML) protocols such as Customer DueDiligence and transaction monitoring.
The SFC notes the potential benefits of tokenisation, including increasing efficiency, enhancing transparency, reducing settlement time, and lowering costs for traditional finance, but also recognises that the use of DLT can create additional risks.
Financial institutions must align with UK and EU regulations by 2025, implementing unified compliance frameworks, advanced risk management, and real-time monitoring tools. Cyber threats rank as the fourth biggest risk for financial services in 2024, with an average score of 6.02 What’s next?
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 5,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content